Editors Note: March is Women’s History Month and in honor of the great things women have contributed to nonprofits and social good, we invited Margie Clayman (who has guest posted here before) to profile some of these admirable women. But before we get started, I asked Margie for her thoughts on why so many women have chosen to work in the nonprofit world, and here’s her thought-provoking answer.
The last time I was here in Mightycause land, we talked about the fact that women actually seem more active in charitable causes than men are. Around that time, I was working on a post for my own blog about the still existing payment gap between men and women in the business world.
Even though women seem to be exceling in education, and even though women are more numerous in middle-management positions than men, very few women are in the CEO chair. There have been a lot of articles examining this phenomenon. Some indicate that women may leave the business world to pursue their own entrepreneurial dreams, as this article from Forbes does.
I wanted to see if there was a way to tie this payment gap to women’s propensity to be so giving. If women are making less than men, how is it that they are more charitable?
As I was researching this topic, I learned that the same payment gap exists in the world of NPOs. In fact, in some cases the gap is bigger than it is in the business world. This led me to a new question entirely. In the world of nonprofits, do women make less money than men because it’s not the money that motivates them?
Kicking Butt for Less Money
First, let’s talk cold hard facts. I found a study from the Montana Non-Profit Association that was presented in November of 2011. I found the following points particularly interesting.
- — According to a 2009 study, 78% of NPO employees were women
- — Women run 57% of NPOs with budgets under $1 million
- — Women only run 16% of NPOs with budgets of $50 million
- — Women represent 48% of the leadership but only earn 29% of the compensation
- — In NPOs with budgets between $250,000-400,000, women earn 86% of what men earn, but in NPOs with budgets of $50 million or more women are only at 75% of men’s earnings
These are just a few of the stats from the presentation. I encourage you to read the whole thing. It’s more of the same.
For me this just raises more questions. Why are women in charge of more than half of the smaller NPOs out there? Are these entrepreneurial efforts that the women started themselves? Don’t these smaller NPOs ever grow into super big ones with women still at the helm? Is a woman working for an NPO societally acceptable while a woman running an NPO hedging bets against what society is comfortable with? And most importantly, WHY are women earning less in this sector, just like they are in the business world? In fact, in some comparisons from that Montana presentation the gender gap is worse in the NPO world than it is in the business world.
Seems kind of backwards, doesn’t it?
Does it even matter?
I have been privileged to make the acquaintance of quite a few extraordinary women who work for or run NPOs, and you know what? The money seems to be a low priority for them across the board. Fundraising for their NPO is certainly a concern, but a personal paycheck is something you seldom hear these women talk about. They do what they do because passion doesn’t give them a choice. They do it because they really believe in what they are doing. They don’t expect a thank you, not to mention a raise.
Now the question becomes a bit different. Are we saying that in the NPO world men prioritize money more than women do? Are we saying men are less driven by passion and more driven by a paycheck?
What do you think?
What’s your thought on the wages gap that exists in the NPO world? Are women paid less because money is not their primary concern?
I’d love to hear your thoughts!